Comparison of AVIF and WebP file size
← All posts

AVIF vs. WebP – what's the difference for your WordPress site?

Both formats save bandwidth. But AVIF compresses significantly better — and is the only standard that also supports accessibility-relevant metadata.

WebP has been the standard for modern image optimisation in WordPress for years. Well-supported, fast to convert, no problems in any current browser. So why bother with AVIF?

What AVIF does better

AVIF (AV1 Image File Format) is the newer standard — developed by the Alliance for Open Media, the same people behind the AV1 video codec. In practice that means:

  • 20–50% smaller files compared to WebP at equivalent quality
  • Better compression for photos with many colour nuances
  • HDR and wide gamut support natively built in

What that means for WordPress

Concretely: a product page with 10 images at 150 KB WebP each becomes 80–100 KB per image with AVIF. That’s up to 500 KB less per page load — without visible quality loss.

Core Web Vitals respond directly: Largest Contentful Paint improves because the hero image loads faster.

Browser support

AVIF has been supported by Chrome, Firefox, and Safari since 2022. Older browsers automatically get WebP as a fallback via the <picture> element — Img Performer rewrites the srcset accordingly.

Accessibility: the hidden advantage

Unlike pure file-size optimisers, Img Performer PRO also considers the accessibility angle: AVIF files can embed alt text and accessibility metadata in a standards-compliant way. This is relevant today — for public sector organisations and increasingly for commercial websites under the EAA.

Conclusion

WebP is good. AVIF is better — when the conversion is done right. Img Performer PRO handles this automatically on every upload, without you having to worry about browser compatibility.